“and also”? no. The Constitution exist TO limit the powers of government; to protect we the people FROM government abuses.
and also the president is a Marxist by admission; FDR would be beyond ecstatic.
The senate’s NEEDLESS introduction prior to the preamble *cough* *cough* seems to better grasp the Constitution than the white house
“We The People” – affirm that the government of the United States exists to serve its citizens. The supremacy of the people
Government exists to serve the people. Also missing some key concepts
One can NOT have one’s will usurped: EVER. One must consent to be governed.
The senate’s understand is awry
the Constitution has evolved
FALSE! The Constitution HAS NOT evolved.
The Senate errantly applies revisionist history tactics of liberalism via self evidently self refuting subjective reality. A running commentary in English on the Constitution, itself not surprisingly written in English, is wholly unnecessary ESPECIALLY on a federal site.
Seth Wisely said: the tree of liberty NEVER CAN die
Comments Off on and also provides important limitations? current white house staff limited grasp of English, zero honor
pesky truth always getting in the way of liberalese fear mongering
Let’s do nothing… mostly because even if liberalist scientificalists are correct NOTHING we can do can begin to effect change in the environment. The ‘problem’ if true is orders of magnitude more vast than all the money and resources on the planet (For this discussion we will be completely ignoring the most proximate star’s effect on the planet and it’s contribution to life genesis potential).
It is not cost effective to “do something” that has ZERO potential of efficacy.
I hope it is self evident to all that sovereignty of America CANNOT by construction be signed away by the president. The attempt to destroy national sovereignty in and of itself is treasonous. Impeachment for gross violation of the public trust is but the first step in the change we deserve.
Climate scientificalists conveniently use assumptions as evidence. Is it any wonder climatology scientificalist models conclusions match the ‘evidence’?
Have the scientificalists volunteered the volume of water that would be gained by melting all ice at both poles? (do they know that water’s volume will decrease in so doing?)
Have the scientificalists discussed the causes of ice ages? (d’oh pesky sun… they are only interested in solarity in evil power consumption arguments)
all of these fuels (energy sources) are ALL ultimately from the sun:
- fossil fuel (oil or coal) – biochemical solar power: plants absorbing solar power and the evil-plant-predators that ate them
- nuclear fuels – elements near dawn of stellar body (the sun)
- hydrogen as fuel (see nuclear fuels)
- natural gas (biochemical solar power)
Yes, these are all natural, solar power… AND EFFICACIOUS. A modern nuclear power plant — that liberalists will not ‘allow’ us to build in our own country — generates almost enough waste to fill a Barq’s rootbeer can.
@ Vegetarians & Vegans
You hypocrites! You are all evil-plant-predators. If you were true to your ideology you would be strict carrions.
Do you really want to reduce CO2 more than anything? Please stop exhaling: you are damaging the environment according to your ideology otherwise you are a cowardly hypocrite.
“carbon credit” n.
Permission purchased to ignore emissions (alledgedly) damaging to the environment.
Ignoring the problem per se will be as efficacious and zero cost. Win Win.
Comments Off on seven meter rise in sea level? When you cannot be bothered with science simple issues like volume, surface area, or density change of ice to water must be ignored
Comments Off on Obama gets his own tribute propaganda song (金日成將軍의 노래) to brainwash children in public schools